You
are visiting
www.rawfoodinfo.com
Truthout.org
August 31, 2005
Did
New Orleans Catastrophe Have to Happen?
By Will Bunch
'Times-Picayune' had repeatedly raised federal spending issues.
Philadelphia - Even though Hurricane Katrina has moved
well north of the city, the waters may still keep rising in New Orleans. That's
because Lake Pontchartrain continues to pour through a two-block-long break
in the main levee, near the city's 17th Street Canal. With much of the Crescent
City some 10 feet below sea level, the rising tide may not stop until it's level
with the massive lake.
New Orleans had long known it was highly vulnerable
to flooding and a direct hit from a hurricane. In fact, the federal government
has been working with state and local officials in the region since the late
1960s on major hurricane and flood relief efforts. When flooding from a massive
rainstorm in May 1995 killed six people, Congress authorized the Southeast Louisiana
Urban Flood Control Project, or SELA.
Over the next 10 years, the Army Corps of Engineers,
tasked with carrying out SELA, spent $430 million on shoring up levees and building
pumping stations, with $50 million in local aid. But at least $250 million in
crucial projects remained, even as hurricane activity in the Atlantic Basin
increased dramatically and the levees surrounding New Orleans continued to subside.
Yet after 2003, the flow of federal dollars toward SELA
dropped to a trickle. The Corps never tried to hide the fact that the spending
pressures of the war in Iraq, as well as homeland security -- coming at the
same time as federal tax cuts -- was the reason for the strain. At least nine
articles in the Times-Picayune from 2004 and 2005 specifically cite the cost
of Iraq as a reason for the lack of hurricane- and flood-control dollars.
Newhouse News Service, in an article posted late Tuesday
night at The Times-Picayune Web site, reported: "No one can say they didn't
see it coming. ... Now in the wake of one of the worst storms ever, serious
questions are being asked about the lack of preparation."
In early 2004, as the cost of the conflict in Iraq soared,
President Bush proposed spending less than 20 percent of what the Corps said
was needed for Lake Pontchartrain, according to a Feb. 16, 2004, article, in
New Orleans CityBusiness.
On June 8, 2004, Walter Maestri, emergency management
chief for Jefferson Parish, Louisiana; told the Times-Picayune: "It appears
that the money has been moved in the president's budget to handle homeland security
and the war in Iraq, and I suppose that's the price we pay. Nobody locally is
happy that the levees can't be finished, and we are doing everything we can
to make the case that this is a security issue for us."
Also that June, with the 2004 hurricane season starting,
the Corps' project manager Al Naomi went before a local agency, the East Jefferson
Levee Authority, and essentially begged for $2 million for urgent work that
Washington was now unable to pay for. From the June 18, 2004 Times-Picayune:
"The system is in great shape, but the levees are
sinking. Everything is sinking, and if we don't get the money fast enough to
raise them, then we can't stay ahead of the settlement," he said. "The
problem that we have isn't that the levee is low, but that the federal funds
have dried up so that we can't raise them."
The panel authorized that money, and on July 1, 2004,
it had to pony up another $250,000 when it learned that stretches of the levee
in Metairie had sunk by four feet. The agency had to pay for the work with higher
property taxes. The levee board noted in October 2004 that the feds were also
now not paying for a hoped-for $15 million project to better shore up the banks
of Lake Pontchartrain.
The 2004 hurricane season was the worst in decades.
In spite of that, the federal government came back this spring with the steepest
reduction in hurricane and flood-control funding for New Orleans in history.
Because of the proposed cuts, the Corps office there imposed a hiring freeze.
Officials said that money targeted for the SELA project -- $10.4 million, down
from $36.5 million -- was not enough to start any new jobs.
There was, at the same time, a growing recognition that
more research was needed to see what New Orleans must do to protect itself from
a Category 4 or 5 hurricane. But once again, the money was not there. As the
Times-Picayune reported last Sept. 22:
"That second study would take about four years
to complete and would cost about $4 million, said Army Corps of Engineers project
manager Al Naomi. About $300,000 in federal money was proposed for the 2005
fiscal-year budget, and the state had agreed to match that amount. But the cost
of the Iraq war forced the Bush administration to order the New Orleans district
office not to begin any new studies, and the 2005 budget no longer includes
the needed money, he said."
The Senate was seeking to restore some of the SELA funding
cuts for 2006. But now it's too late.
One project that a contractor had been racing to finish
this summer: a bridge and levee job right at the 17th Street Canal, site of
the main breach on Monday.
The Newhouse News Service article published Tuesday
night observed, "The Louisiana congressional delegation urged Congress
earlier this year to dedicate a stream of federal money to Louisiana's coast,
only to be opposed by the White House. ... In its budget, the Bush administration
proposed a significant reduction in funding for southeast Louisiana's chief
hurricane protection project. Bush proposed $10.4 million, a sixth of what local
officials say they need."
Local officials are now saying, the article reported,
that had Washington heeded their warnings about the dire need for hurricane
protection, including building up levees and repairing barrier islands, "the
damage might not have been nearly as bad as it turned out to be."
--------
Will Bunch is senior writer at the Philadelphia Daily
News. He won a Pulitzer Prize in 1992 when he reported for Newsday. Much of
this article also appears on his blog, Attytood, at the Daily News.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
AntiWar.com
01 September 2005
How
New Orleans Was Lost
By Paul Craig Roberts
Chalk up the city of New Orleans as a cost of Bush's
Iraq war.
There were not enough helicopters to repair the breached
levees and rescue people trapped by rising water. Nor are there enough Louisiana
National Guardsmen available to help with rescue efforts and to patrol against
looting.
The situation is the same in Mississippi.
The National Guard and helicopters are off on a fool's
mission in Iraq.
The National Guard is in Iraq because fanatical neoconservatives
in the Bush administration were determined to invade the Middle East and because
incompetent Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld refused to listen to the generals,
who told him there were not enough regular troops available to do the job.
After the invasion, the arrogant Rumsfeld found out
that the generals were right. The National Guard was called up to fill in the
gaping gaps.
Now the Guardsmen, trapped in the Iraqi quagmire, are
watching on TV the families they left behind trapped by rising waters and wondering
if the floating bodies are family members. None know where their dislocated
families are, but, shades of Fallujah, they do see their destroyed homes.
The mayor of New Orleans was counting on helicopters
to put in place massive sandbags to repair the levee. However, someone called
the few helicopters away to rescue people from rooftops. The rising water overwhelmed
the massive pumping stations, and New Orleans disappeared under deep water.
What a terrible casualty of the Iraqi war - one of our
oldest and most beautiful cities, a famous city, a historic city.
Distracted by its phony war on terrorism, the U.S. government
had made no preparations in the event Hurricane Katrina brought catastrophe
to New Orleans. No contingency plan existed. Only now after the disaster are
FEMA and the Corps of Engineers trying to assemble the material and equipment
to save New Orleans from the fate of Atlantis.
Even worse, articles in the New Orleans Times-Picayune
and public statements by emergency management chiefs in New Orleans make it
clear that the Bush administration slashed the funding for the Corps of Engineers'
projects to strengthen and raise the New Orleans levees and diverted the money
to the Iraq war.
Walter Maestri, emergency management chief for Jefferson
Parish, told the New Orleans Times-Picayune (June 8, 2004): "It appears
that the money has been moved in the president's budget to handle homeland security
and the war in Iraq, and I suppose that's the price we pay. Nobody locally is
happy that the levees can't be finished, and we are doing everything we can
to make the case that this is a security issue for us."
Why can't the U.S. government focus on America's needs
and leave other countries alone? Why are American troops in Iraq instead of
protecting our own borders from a mass invasion by illegal immigrants? Why are
American helicopters blowing up Iraqi homes instead of saving American homes
in New Orleans?
How can the Bush administration be so incompetent as
to expose Americans at home to dire risks by exhausting American resources in
foolish foreign adventures? What kind of "homeland security" is this?
All Bush has achieved by invading Iraq is to kill and
wound thousands of people while destroying America's reputation. The only beneficiaries
are oil companies capitalizing on a good excuse to jack up the price of gasoline
and Osama bin Laden's recruitment.
What we have is a Republican war for oil company profits
while New Orleans sinks beneath the waters.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
New
York Times
Op-Ed Columnist
Sept. 3, 2005
United
States of Shame
By MAUREEN DOWD
Stuff
happens.
And when you combine limited government with incompetent government, lethal
stuff happens.
America is once more plunged into a snake pit of anarchy, death, looting, raping,
marauding thugs, suffering innocents, a shattered infrastructure, a gutted police
force, insufficient troop levels and criminally negligent government planning.
But this time it's happening in America.
W. drove his budget-cutting Chevy to the levee, and it wasn't dry. Bye, bye,
American lives. "I don't think anyone anticipated the breach of the levees,"
he told Diane Sawyer.
Shirt-sleeves rolled up, W. finally landed in Hell yesterday and chuckled about
his wild boozing days in "the great city" of N'Awlins. He was clearly
moved. "You know, I'm going to fly out of here in a minute," he said
on the runway at the New Orleans International Airport, "but I want you
to know that I'm not going to forget what I've seen." Out of the cameras'
range, and avoided by W., was a convoy of thousands of sick and dying people,
some sprawled on the floor or dumped on baggage carousels at a makeshift M*A*S*H
unit inside the terminal.
Why does this self-styled "can do" president always lapse into such
lame "who could have known?" excuses.
Who on earth could have known that Osama bin Laden wanted to attack us by flying
planes into buildings? Any official who bothered to read the trellis of pre-9/11
intelligence briefs.
Who on earth could have known that an American invasion of Iraq would spawn
a brutal insurgency, terrorist recruiting boom and possible civil war? Any official
who bothered to read the C.I.A.'s prewar reports. Who on earth could have known
that New Orleans's sinking levees were at risk from a strong hurricane? Anybody
who bothered to read the endless warnings over the years about the Big Easy's
uneasy fishbowl. In June 2004, Walter Maestri, emergency management chief for
Jefferson Parish, fretted to The Times-Picayune in New Orleans: "It appears
that the money has been moved in the president's budget to handle homeland security
and the war in Iraq, and I suppose that's the price we pay. Nobody locally is
happy that the levees can't be finished, and we are doing everything we can
to make the case that this is a security issue for us."
Not only was the money depleted by the Bush folly in Iraq; 30 percent of the
National Guard and about half its equipment are in Iraq. Ron Fournier of The
Associated Press reported that the Army Corps of Engineers asked for $105 million
for hurricane and flood programs in New Orleans last year. The White House carved
it to about $40 million. But President Bush and Congress agreed to a $286.4
billion pork-filled highway bill with 6,000 pet projects, including a $231 million
bridge for a small, uninhabited Alaskan island.
Just last year, Federal Emergency Management Agency officials practiced how
they would respond to a fake hurricane that caused floods and stranded New Orleans
residents. Imagine the feeble FEMA's response to Katrina if they had not prepared.
Michael Brown, the blithering idiot in charge of FEMA - a job he trained for
by running something called the International Arabian Horse Association - admitted
he didn't know until Thursday that there were 15,000 desperate, dehydrated,
hungry, angry, dying victims of Katrina in the New Orleans Convention Center.
Was he sacked instantly? No, our tone-deaf president hailed him in Mobile, Ala.,
yesterday: "Brownie, you're doing a heck of a job." It would be one
thing if President Bush and his inner circle - Dick Cheney was vacationing in
Wyoming; Condi Rice was shoe shopping at Ferragamo's on Fifth Avenue and attended
"Spamalot" before bloggers chased her back to Washington; and Andy
Card was off in Maine - lacked empathy but could get the job done. But it is
a chilling lack of empathy combined with a stunning lack of efficiency that
could make this administration implode.
When the president and vice president rashly shook off our allies and our respect
for international law to pursue a war built on lies, when
they sanctioned torture, they shook the faith of the world in American ideals.
When they were deaf for so long to the horrific misery and cries for help of
the victims in New Orleans - most of them poor and black, like those stuck at
the back of the evacuation line yesterday while 700 guests and employees of
the Hyatt Hotel were bused out first - they shook the faith of all Americans
in American ideals. And made us ashamed.
Who are we if we can't take care of our own?
E-mail: liberties@nytimes.com
Back to Articles/Government & Politics
|
|
|
|
|